Enjoy this article? Subscribe to the weekly newsletter to hear about them all. Or grab my RSS feed
Sacred Cows – Organic food
Previous post: Shrinkies
Next post: Wordless Wednesday – Lizard Tail
Science activities for parents of babies, toddlers and school children.
Enjoy this article? Subscribe to the weekly newsletter to hear about them all. Or grab my RSS feed
Previous post: Shrinkies
Next post: Wordless Wednesday – Lizard Tail
{ 6 comments }
Thankyou Terrie. I know my experience with organic foods is mixed – I have organic free range hens and I honestly can’t tell the difference between their eggs and supermarket eggs. And the fact that we have had several killed by feral dogs means I’m very sympathetic to barns – it isn’t a nice way to go.
I know the problem with antibiotics is more producing resistant strains than having us drink them, but it doesn’t happen where I am because I’m in the middle of nowhere and the cattle roam vast stations. However, that’s terrible for the environment as well because they damage the soil and kill the young plants. Basically cattle shouldn’t be here at all. And crops are even worse – at least the cattle leave some of the native plants there!
I think there’s a level of damage we have to accept with agriculture because however you do it, it is unnatural and people need to be fed. There does have to be research into how to do it the best way for both people and the land because it can’t just keep going, but the organic food industry hasn’t really done this research and is basically a marketing juggernaut.
I have a few counter arguments. One problem with current organic farming is that it is still monofarming which loses many of the benefits of ideal organic farming. An ideal organic farm would be one farm that produces a wide variety of vegetables, fruits, eggs, and meat for consumption. My understanding is that in this type of farm the need for additional fertilizer, herbicide, and fungicides are less.
Also according to wikipedia nitrogen is in the air, but to make it available to plants fossil fuels are burned to complete the process.
Finally the study linked to was a review on the health benefits of organic eating, it was a review of existing studies, but it said there weren’t enough high-quality studies to be definitive. My understanding has been that when you test the nutrition content of an organic fruit vs a non-organic fruit the nutrition content is higher in the organic one. So you could eat just as nutritionally non-organically, but you’d have to eat more…
Yes, I agree that companies have used subterfuge in the organic movement and made it less environmentally friendly than it could be. Yes, people take advantage of the “green” movement, but that doesn’t mean the movement is wrong. As a consumer we just have to keep demanding the best.
Laura´s latest amazing offering ..Baby Birth Weight and Mothers Pre-pregnancy Weight
Hi Laura, I have to agree that mixed farming is definitely preferable to mono-cropping. If you look at farming as a cycle then plants remove nutrients but don’t replace them, only animals do through manure. Of course naturally plants would replace nutrients when they die and are broken down, but in farming they are harvested and used for their seeds and hay.
This is one of the reasons for the old crop and animal rotation systems and growing clover, which fixes nitrogen in the soil for other plants to use later. I don’t know much about mediaeval types of farming practices, but the little bit I know is fascinating to see how it all worked together to move the nutrients back into the soil.
When you say fossil fuels are burned for nitrogen, do you mean the Haber-Bosch process for making ammonia? It would be interesting to know what process Brian Dunning is referring to, because he clearly states ‘produces no waste’ and while the Haber-Bosch process itself has no waste, CO2 seems to be a waste product from making the hydrogen and methane used. So it needs to be seen how the burning of gas to produce the ammonia balances against the burning of fuel to apply more of the less efficient fertilisers.
This doesn’t take into account the extra applications of less efficient pesticides that also burns fuel and produces carbon dioxide in organic farming. I don’t know enough about farming to know what sort of impact this has.
You might be interested in this analysis on the nutritional content of organic foods. It’s a few years old, but I know there was one released by the UK Department of Agriculture in the last couple of years that I haven’t been able to find, I’m not sure if it is the same one but it had the same results – there is no evidence of nutritional differences between organic and intensively farmed foods, (except possibly vitamin C in green leafy vegetables). Now no evidence doesn’t necessarily mean no difference, but given the time and number of studies it is a very interesting finding. And given the general principal that if you make a claim you should have the evidence to back it up, organic farming doesn’t.
And I think that’s what Terrie is talking about here – the way that organic food has been marketed to consumers. Unfortunately there isn’t any evidence it is nutritionally better and the environmental claims seem to be questionable. I agree wholeheartedly that we should be questioning farming practices, but ‘organic products’ as they are currently sold to consumers seem to be getting in the way of this questioning rather than helping.
What a great post!
A friend and I have recently been discussing the organic food thing… questioning whether it really is better for our kids to buy organic or is it just as healthful to buy regular non-organic but more local produce? Is it worth the extra money spent which means less of something else? Is it worth driving kms to get it?
For us right now it’s not worth it, but I still have some guilt about that decision, so it’s interesting to read this and process these new ideas,.
Thanks for sharing!
yeah I tend to buy local over organic as then I really do know where its come from – and in most cases its probably truly organic anyway, just not ‘certified organic’
Excellent post Deb. I’m a former scientist-now doctor and have long noticed organic food seems to be a sacred cow for many people. It’s rare to see the other side of it presented. I agree that buying local is better environmentally, it’s what my husband and I do as much as we can. If it’s organic it’s organic but if not…well we let that sacred cow out the gate a while ago!
Comments on this entry are closed.